Saturday, 18 February 2012

Slip sliding


Or rather, side slipping...

Today was my first proper assignment in my new guise as HNBOC Press Officer and, by default, official photographer. The event was the launch of Walton - a wooden boat built in 1939 at FMC's Uxbridge yard, and subsequently purchased by the Mersey, Weaver and Ship Canal Carrying Company. Walton is now owned by Ade, who has been working on its restoration for many years. The latest, just completed phase, has been the replacement of the fore end bottoms.

The launch was to be by the traditional side slipping method, whereby the boat is released to slide down greased timber runners (what is their proper name?), er, sideways. This morning I was suddenly struck by the responsibility I'd taken on - supposing my photos of this seldom seen and dramatic event weren't any good? I ferretted out the instruction book for my new camera and checked up on shooting fast sequences of photos - up to 3.4 per second. Once sure I could remember how to set that up, we set off for Malkins bank, somewhere I'd never been before.

A warm, muddy welcome awaited us, and we were offered soup while a small band played. A small crowd of children got very muddy, whilst nearly every boat restorer you've ever heard of joined the throng. I was given privileged access to the far bank of the dock - which wasn't very wide - and found myself what I hoped was a suitable position. At one o'clock on the dock, Walton was released, and I reckon my camera earned its keep pretty well:







Well, I have picked the best one (wonder if you'll agree which that is), cropped it a bit and sent it off with a press release to the canal mags, and also to the gentleman from the Stoke Sentinel who was there with his lovely lady assistant trying to get various boat people to pose in increasingly foolish ways on Walton - so look out for that on Monday if you're in the Stoke area; and if you're not, hopefully there should be something in Canal Boat and/or Waterways World next month.

9 comments:

  1. You went for the fourth in the series i'll bet.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'll vote for number three

    ReplyDelete
  3. Excellent photo's of a rare event Sarah, well done. Number 4?
    Lesley

    ReplyDelete
  4. You're probably all right - the fourth of all of them including the one at the top; the third of the rest.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I liked 4 and 5 although the fourth one just wins as it has such a lovely shaped wave :-)
    Kath (nb Herbie)

    ReplyDelete
  6. How are we numbering these pictures, from the top or just the run of seven? If from the top then my three becomes four and we are unanimous!

    ReplyDelete
  7. There's a simple reason why one photo of the sequence is on its own at the top. I wrote the text. I uploaded the photos. Then rather than try and move all the photos (who knows what sort of disaster might have ensued), I moved the text. But it wasn't possible to insert the text before the first photo, only after it. Hence the separation. But they are all a single sequence, taken in about two and a half seconds.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi Sarah, As I'm sure you will know, it is possible, in gallery view, to run the seven photos as a sequence so as to produce a moving picture - very effective, almost as good as video

    ReplyDelete
  9. Have you seen Mike Askin's video of it?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBv0zKd0_iA

    ReplyDelete